From operational hazards to organizational weaknesses: Changing the focus for improvement

Authors

  • Georges Loiselle
  • Dragan Komljenovic Hydro-Quebec/IREQ
  • Mustafa Kumral McGill University, Mining Engineering

Abstract

The daily operations in the mining industry are still a significant source of risk with regard to occupational safety and health (OS&H). Various research studies and statistical data world-wide show that the number of serious injuries and fatalities still remains high despite substantial efforts the industry has put in recent years in decreasing those numbers. This paper argues that the next level of safety performance will have to consider a transition from coping solely with workplace dangers, to a more systemic model taking organizational risks in consideration. In this particular aspect, lessons learned from the nuclear industry may be useful, as organizational learning processes are more universal than the technology in which they are used.

With the notable exception of major accidents, organizational performance has not received all the attention it deserved. A key element for reaching the next level of performance is to include organizational factors in low level events analyses, and approach management as a risk control system. These factors will then appear not only in event analysis, but in supervision activities, audits, change management and the like.Many recent event analyses across various industries have shown that organizational factors play a key role in creating conditions for triggering major accidents (aviation, railway transportation, nuclear industry, oil exploitation, mining etc.). In the following paper, we will present a perspective that may be used in supervisory activities, self-assessments and minor events investigations. When ingrained in an organizational culture, this perspective has the highest potential for continuous safety improvement.

Author Biography

Dragan Komljenovic, Hydro-Quebec/IREQ

Dragan Komljenovic received his BSc at the University of Tuzla, his MSc at the University of Belgrade, and his PhD at Laval University, Canada in Mining Engineering.  Dragan works as a researcher at the Hydro-Quebec’s Research Institute (IREQ) in the field of reliability, asset management, risk analysis, and maintenance optimization.  Prior to joining IREQ, he worked as a Reliability and Nuclear Safety Engineer at the Nuclear Generating Station Gentilly-2, Hydro-Quebec.  He is also appointed as Adjunct Professor at the University of Waterloo, Canada (Industrial Research Chair “Risk-Based Life Cycle Management of Engineering Systems”) and Laval University in Quebec-City (mining engineering).  He has published more than 60 refereed journal and conference papers.  He also worked in the mining industry as well as a researcher and lecturer at the University of Tuzla and Laval University.

References

Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1996), Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice, Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.

Carrillo, R.A. (2011), Complexity and safety, Journal of Safety Research 42 (2011) 293–300

Dekker, S., Cilliers, P., Hofmeyr , J-H, (2011), The complexity of failure: Implications of complexity theory for safety investigations, Safety Science 49 (2011) 939–945

Department of Energy, DoE, (2009), Human Performance Improvement Handbook, vol. 1, DOE Standard, Washington D.C., http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/06/f1/doe-hdbk-1028-2009_volume1.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2015)

Homer-Dixon, T., (2011), Complexity Science, Shifting the Trajectory of Civilisation, Oxford Leadership Journal, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2-15

IAEA, (2013), Managing human performance to improve nuclear facility operation, Vienna, http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1623_web.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2015)

Johnson, W.G., (1975), Accident/Incident Investigation Manual, U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration, Division of Safety, Standards, and Compliance

Kahneman, D. (2012), Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 533p.

Komljenovic, D., Abdul-Nour, G. and Popovic, N. (2015), An approach for strategic planning and asset management in the mining industry in the context of business and operational complexity, Int. J. Mining and Mineral Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp.338–360.

Leveson, N.G. (2011), Engineering a Safer World, Systems Thinking Applied to Safety, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA; http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/engineering-safer-world (accessed on 20 November, 2015)

Mosey, D. (2014), Looking beyond operator, NEI Magazine, http://www.neimagazine.com/features/featurelooking-beyond-the-operator-4447549/, (accessed on 26 November, 2015)

MSHA Investigation, (2011), Fatal Underground Mine Explosion, April 5, 2010: Upper Big Branch Mine-South, Performance Coal Company, Montcoal, Raleigh County, West Virginia, ID No. 46-08436, http://www.msha.gov/Fatals/2010/UBB/PerformanceCoalUBB.asp; http://www.npr.org/documents/2011/may/giip-massey-report.pdf (accessed on 24 November 2015)

NERC, (2011), Cause Analysis Methods for NERC, Regional Entities, and Registered Entities; http://www.nerc.com/files/Cause-Analysis-Methods-Version1-2-Oct10.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2015)

OECD Global Science Forum, (2009), Application of Complexity Science for Public Policy; New Tools for Finding Unanticipated Consequences and Unrealized Opportunities,

Erice, Italy,

http://www.oecd.org/science/sci-tech/43891980.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2015)

Perrow C. (1999), Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technology, Basic Books, New York.

Rzevski, G. (2011) A practical methodology for managing complexity, E:CO Issue Vol. 13 No. 1-2. 38-55

US NRC, (2012), Safety Culture Communicator, Case Study 4: April 2010 Upper Big Branch Mine Explosion – 29 Lives Lost, Washington D.C. http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1206/ML12069A003.pdf (accessed on 26 November 2015)

Downloads

Published

2016-11-28

Issue

Section

Part 2 Technology