Numerical modelling of the goaf: Methodology and application
Résumé
The mechanical behavior of the goaf is a critical issue that may affect the efficiency of long-wall mining. Goaf numerical modelling as a continuous material is a challenge, especially because its large-scale mechanical properties are not precisely known. Many different values of the elastic modulus may be found in literature to be used for representing the mechanical behavior of the goaf area. In this research, the elastic numerical modelling is shown to be a useful tool for simulating the stress redistribution and displacement due to long-wall mining with taking into account the goaf geometry and its equivalent mechanical properties. The analysis is applied on the Provence coalmine, in the south of France, which had been in operation for more than 50 years where the long-wall mining method was used. A finite difference numerical model of the mine is constructed and two approaches are carried out in order to simulate the goaf area above the excavated panels where the panels have various length to width ratios. In the first approach, the caved zone and the fractured zone have different but homogeneous elastic modulus, both zones have elastic modulus lower than the unaffected host rock. In the second one, their elastic modulus varies linearly with the vertical distance above the panel, up to the elastic modulus of the host rock. In both cases with and without goaf, the subsidence at the ground surface is calculated and compared with in-situ measured values. Results show that attributing to the goaf area a low elastic modulus increases the vertical stress within the rib pillars as well as the subsidence at the surface. The elastic modulus for the direct roof above the panel after excavation has found to be 225 <= Eimmediate-roof (MPa) <= 180 in order to satisfy the total convergence between the roof and the floor. Representing the goaf area as a material with linearly varying elastic modulus gives rational results in terms of convergence and ground surface subsidence.Références
Gaviglio P, Bigarre P, Baroudi H, Piguet J.P and Monteau R. (1996). Measurements of natural stresses in a Provence mine (Southern France). Journal Engineering Geology. Volume 44, pp. 77-92.
Pappas DM and Mark C., 1993. Behaviour of simulated longwall gob material. Report of investigation no. 9458, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, 39 p.
Peng S.S. and Chaing H.S. (1984) Longwall Mining. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York; pp. 17- 73
Shabanimashcool, M. and Charlie, C.L. (2012) Numerical modelling of longwall mining and stability analysis of the gates in a coal mine. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. Volume 51, pp. 24–34.
Salamon MDG. (1990). Mechanism of caving in longwall mining. In: Hustrulid W, Johnson G, editors. Proceedings of the 31st US rock mechanical symposium, Golden, Colorado. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 161–68.
Sheorey P. R. (1993) Design of coal pillar arrays and chain pillars. Comprehension Rock Engineering, Vol. 2. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Wilson A. H. (1982). Pillar stability in longwall mining. State of the Art of Ground Control in Longwall Mining and Mining Science, Y. P. Chugh and M. Karmis (eds.), SME, New York; pp. 85-95.
Wilson A.H., 1980. The stability of underground workings in the soft rocks of coal measures. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Univ. Nottingham.
Yavuz H. (2004) An estimation method for cover pressure re-establishment distance and pressure distribution in the goaf of longwall coal mines.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. Volume 41, pp. 193–205.
Gaviglio P., 1985. La deformation cassante dans les calcaires Fuvéliens du basin de l’arc (Provence). PhD thesis. University of Provence, Marseille, France.
